CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Fall 2006, W.B. Fisch
Assignment #7
Ch.
4 THE SCOPE OF
NATIONAL POWER (early developments)
- Proceedings of the Constitutional
Convention, pp. 127-133
- Transition from
general definition of federal regulatory power (Virginia Plan) to
detailed enumeration
- What is the
significance of this transition? How should it impact on the
interpretation of the enumerated powers?
- MCCULLOCH V. MARYLAND, p. 134
(1819). What constitutional issues are presented here?
- power of Congress to
create a central bank
- what
arguments against such power?
- states as sovereign
creators of the national government
- no explicit
authority in the constitution to create a bank
- "necessary and
proper" means "indispensible"
- how
does Marshall
meet these arguments?
- power of the state to
tax notes issued by the bank
- what
arguments against the state tax?
- why
doesn't the analogy to federal tax on states work?
- Methods of interpretation
in McCulloch:
- "(W)e must never forget that it is a constitution
we are expounding."(p. 137, emphasis mine) What
does that mean? )(Consider the entire paragraph
that ends in this sentence!
- compare McCulloch
with Marbury
- distinguish
between power-granting and power-limiting clauses?
- Necessary and proper
clause and "implied powers "
- Does the opinion in
fact recognize "implied powers"?
- What is the
significance of the distinction between "means" and
"ends"?
- what
role does the concept of representation play in McCulloch?
- Power of Congress to Build
and Maintain "Infrastructure" (Roads and Canals)
- Did Madison, p. 143, correctly interpret
the Constitution in vetoing the Improvements Bill?
- Commerce Power, after
McCulloch?
- Spending Power?
- Is there room for
independent judgment on his part in making that decision?
- The Other Issue in
McCulloch (State Tax): A Modern Application
- U.S. Term Limits v.
Thornton, p. 144 (1995): state law imposing Congressional term limits
- does
the decision follow from Powell v. McCormick? How would one
distinguish the two cases?
- does
the decision follow from McCulloch? does
it conflict with McCulloch?
- Cook v. Gralike, p. 146 (2001): state law requiring
ballots to show candidates' positions on term limits
- if
the states can't impose term limits, can they force candidates to take a
position?
- is
this particular measure even-handed with respect to what position to
take? Does it matter?