CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
W.B. Fisch, Fall 2006
Assignment #9

3. The Scope of National Power Today

 

Development from Cooley to Jones & Laughlin Steel:  Kennedy’s summary pp. 162-168

·        A negative definition of “commerce among the several states”?

o       E.C. Knight in antitrust law, cf.  Standard Oil

o       Adair in labor relations, cf. Railway Clerks regarding railroad labor

·        Power to regulate the movement of goods in interstate commerce:

o       power to prohibit movement of particular goods? 

§        “Goods” that are themselves harmful?  Lottery Case, Hipolite Egg, Hoke

§        Goods that are manufactured under conditions harmful to labor?  Hammer v. Dagenhart (pretextual use of power to prohibit movement, in order to regulate intrastate activities?)

o       Power to regulate intrastate components of interstate movement?  Rate Cases

 

"Court-Packing Plan", p. 168:

  • Was it constitutional?
  • did it cause the turn-around in early 1937?  Jones & Laughlin Steel and Steward Machine on New Deal legislation

U.S. v. Darby, p. 169 (1941): explicit rejection of two supposed principles of prior law:

  • That "production" is not "commerce among the several states"
  • That the effects of an activity on IC must be "direct"

Wickard v. Filburn, p. 170 (1942)

  • What activity is being regulated, to what purpose?
  • Is the activity "in commerce"?
  • Does it "substantially affect" i-c?
    • the complaining farmer's own activity?
    • that of others similarly situated?

HEART OF ATLANTA MOTEL V. U.S., p. 172 (1964).

  • What activity is being regulated, and to what purpose?
    • does the statute rely exclusively on the commerce clause for authority? What other constitutional provisions support the statute?
      • 14th amendment equal protection clause?
      • 13th amendment prohibition against slavery/involuntary servitude?
    • does it define the scope of coverage entirely in commerce clause terms?
  • What role do congressional findings play in the decision?
  • In what way does the regulated activity affect interstate commerce?

KATZENBACH V. MCCLUNG, p. 174 (1964).

  • How does this case differ from Heart of Atlanta Motel?
  • What connection with interstate commerce did Congress require in order for the statute to apply?