CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
W.B. Fisch, Fall 2006
Assignment #43
2. The Non-Traditional
Forum -- Speech Activities in Public Property Other Than Parks and Streets
- ADDERLEY
v. FLORIDA,
p. 13485 (1966)
- is
a jail a public forum?
- is
it a seat of government, a place for petition for redress of grievances? Douglas
- compare Edwards v. South Carolina
(1965), on demonstrations at the state capitol
- compare Cox v. Louisiana (1965), on
demonstrations in the traditional public forum near the courthouse
- Widmar v. Vincent (1981) (no reading assigned): university allows use of its
buildings for most extracurricular activities within the university
community, but specifically excludes religious worship. Under the free
speech clause, what standard of review applies?
- is
the university a "traditional public forum"?
- if
not, does strict scrutiny apply anyway, given its policy toward
extracurricular activities?
- Heffron v. ISKCON,
cited p. 1487 (1981): regulation required all solicitation of funds and distributing
of literature at the state fair to be done in designated booths, not in
passageways
- is
the regulation "content-based"?
- is
a state fair a "public forum"?
- if
so, does the regulation at issue survive strict scrutiny?
- if
not a public forum, what standard applies?
- ISKCON
v. LEE, p 1487 (1992)
- note 3-tiered "forum-based"
classification scheme for publicly-owned property, p. 1489
- is
the regulation "content-neutral"?
- is
an airport a public forum?
- Rehnquist, O'Connor (White, Scalia, Thomas): no
- Kennedy, Souter (Stevens, Blackmun): yes
- are
there clear criteria for resolving this issue?
- if
not, what standard of review applies? does the
particular regulation meet it?
- if
so, what standard of review applies? does the
particular regulation meet it?
- Lee v. ISKCON, p. 1495
(1992): how does leafletting differ from
solicitation of funds?
- ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION COMMISSION V. FORBES, p.
1496
- Is a state-owned TV station a “public
forum”?
- Is the regulation in this case
viewpoint-based? If so, is it valid?
- Is the regulation content-based? If so, is
it valid?