EUROPEAN UNION LAW
W.B. Fisch, Winter 2002
Assignment #32
Chapter 37. EQUAL RIGHTS
A. Treaty Articles and Basic Concepts
-
Art. 141 (ex 119) as amended by Amsterdam , p. 1424 (original art.
119 p. 1425)
-
see also arts. 137-140 (ex 117-118), in handout from beginning of semester
-
do these provide an economic protection, or a general human rights protection?
-
New art. 13: is it limited to economic opportunity?
-
DEFRENNE reviewed - direct effect of ex art. 119
-
"Horizontal effect"?
-
Prospective only?
-
does the principle apply to social security benefits? n. 4 p. 1427
B. Equal Pay for Women and Men
-
The Equal Pay Directive of 1975, Dir. 75/117 (Doc.Supp. p. 719)
-
Defining the Concept of "Pay"
-
Art. 141(2) (ex 119(2))
-
How should these be treated (p. 1429)?
-
Annual bonuses
-
Commissions based on sales
-
Paid leave to care for a sick child
-
Christmas or holiday gifts
-
Handling of Indirect Discrimination: when is a facially neutral
practice discriminatory?
-
"Part-time worker", where most of these are women
-
JENKINS, p. 1430 (1981)
-
BILKA-KAUFHAUS GmbH v. VON HARTZ, p. 1432 (1986): what standard does the
Court apply?
-
Kowalska, n. 5 p. 1434 (ECJ 1990)
-
Night shift workers higher paid, where most day-shift workers are women:
Corning
Glass Works, n. 4 p. 1434 (US 1974)
-
U.C.C.E. V. DANISH EMP'ER'S ASS'N ex parte DANFOSS, p. 1434 (1989):
"mobility", "special training", "length of service" as pay-scale factors:
who bears the burden of persuasion, when men make almost 7% more than women
overall?
-
"Maternity leave": GILLESPIE, n. 8 p. 1438 (1996)
-
Determining Work of "Equal Value"
-
MURPHY V. BORD TELECOM EIREANN, p. 1439 (1988): if employer admits that
a classification of workers comprising mostly women gets lower pay, but
does higher-value work than another comprising mostly men, does art. 119
apply?
-
ENDERBY V. FRENCHAY HEALTH AUTHORITY, p. 1441 (1993)
-
Where two categories of worker which get disparate pay are determined by
separate collective bargaining agreements, does art. 119 apply?
-
What constitutes a "prima facie case" of discrimination?
-
If one is made, who bears the burden of persuasion?